Re: [exim] What's up ith the uceprotect blacklist?

Marc Perkel wrote:

>
> W B Hacker wrote:
>
>>Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'm having problems with my spam filtering servers getting listed on
>>>UCEPROTECT and can't figure out why. Is anyone familiar with how this
>>>blacklist works and what I need to do to not get listed?
>>>
>>
>>It is explained on their website.
>>
>>
>>
>>>They seem to hate sender verification - but I'm not going to give that
>>>up.
>>>
>>
>>Many folks treat a sender-verify callout as a probe.
>>Many more don't respond in a useful or timely way.
>>
>>We *have* given it up.
>>
>>
>
>
> Bill, I'm still using sender verification but it's very targeted and
> extremely effective. For me to block with verification the server has to
> let me get to the rctp to: level and affirmatively tell me that the user
> doesn't exist. It's something I'm not giving up.
>

Hopefully you are 'weighting' the result (we did...), as an all/nothing test
will otherwise create more than a few FP's, even if adjusted for time delays.

Bill