Re: [exim] Adding a per-recipient message header

* on the Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:29:32AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:

> Maybe it is a sign of advancing age - or having eaten my fair share of 'poor
> man's food'....
>
> But I'm having a hard time differentiating between 'hash' and 'spam' these days...

*shrug* dictionary.com?

> Either contribute code or give it a rest!

It may come as a surprise to you to find out that most people on this
list aren't c programmers, or aren't good enough c programmers to
contribute code. Does this mean they should shut up and
"give it a rest" ? I fail to see why an enthusiastic request for a new
and useful feature should be dismissed in such a rude manner.

Mike