[exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim…

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Philip Hazel
Date:  
À: exim-cvs
Sujet: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim/exim-src/src parse.c receive.c sieve.c verify.c exim/exim-test/log 0026 exim/exim-test/mail 0026.userx exim/exim-test/rejectlog 0026 exim
ph10 2006/10/10 16:36:51 BST

  Modified files:
    exim-doc/doc-txt     ChangeLog 
    exim-src/src         parse.c receive.c sieve.c verify.c 
    exim-test/log        0026 
    exim-test/mail       0026.userx 
    exim-test/rejectlog  0026 
    exim-test/scripts/0000-Basic 0026 
    exim-test/stderr     0026 
    exim-test/stdout     0026 
  Log:
  Sort out group syntax problems, particularly with verify=header_sender.


  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.406     +11 -0     exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
  1.10      +9 -4      exim/exim-src/src/parse.c
  1.30      +6 -5      exim/exim-src/src/receive.c
  1.23      +2 -0      exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c
  1.43      +60 -26    exim/exim-src/src/verify.c
  1.3       +9 -5      exim/exim-test/log/0026
  1.2       +17 -4     exim/exim-test/mail/0026.userx
  1.3       +11 -0     exim/exim-test/rejectlog/0026
  1.2       +27 -0     exim/exim-test/scripts/0000-Basic/0026
  1.3       +2 -2      exim/exim-test/stderr/0026
  1.2       +16 -4     exim/exim-test/stdout/0026


  Index: ChangeLog
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v
  retrieving revision 1.405
  retrieving revision 1.406
  diff -u -r1.405 -r1.406
  --- ChangeLog    10 Oct 2006 11:15:12 -0000    1.405
  +++ ChangeLog    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.406
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.405 2006/10/10 11:15:12 ph10 Exp $
  +$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.406 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $


   Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
   -------------------------------------------
  @@ -116,6 +116,17 @@
         Originally there were few.) While I was there, I also converted the
         str(n)cmp tests so they don't re-test the leading "-" and the first
         character, in the hope this might squeeze out yet more improvement.
  +
  +PH/18 Two problems with "group" syntax in header lines when verifying: (1) The
  +      flag allowing group syntax was set by the header_syntax check but not
  +      turned off, possible causing trouble later; (2) The flag was not being
  +      set at all for the header_verify test, causing "group"-style headers to
  +      be rejected. I have now set it in this case, and also caused header_
  +      verify to ignore an empty address taken from a group. While doing this, I
  +      came across some other cases where the code for allowing group syntax
  +      while scanning a header line wasn't quite right (mostly, not resetting
  +      the flag correctly in the right place). These bugs could have caused
  +      trouble for malformed header lines. I hope it is now all correct.



Exim version 4.63

  Index: parse.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.9
  retrieving revision 1.10
  diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
  --- parse.c    8 Mar 2006 11:13:07 -0000    1.9
  +++ parse.c    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.10
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v 1.9 2006/03/08 11:13:07 ph10 Exp $ */
  +/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v 1.10 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */


   /*************************************************
   *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
  @@ -597,10 +597,15 @@
   TRUE and parse_found_group is FALSE when this function is called, an address
   which is the start of a group (i.e. preceded by a phrase and a colon) is
   recognized; the phrase is ignored and the flag parse_found_group is set. If
  -this flag is TRUE at the end of an address, then if an extraneous semicolon is
  -found, it is ignored and the flag is cleared. This logic is used only when
  -scanning through addresses in headers, either to fulfil the -t option or for
  -rewriting or checking header syntax.
  +this flag is TRUE at the end of an address, and if an extraneous semicolon is
  +found, it is ignored and the flag is cleared.
  +
  +This logic is used only when scanning through addresses in headers, either to
  +fulfil the -t option, or for rewriting, or for checking header syntax. Because
  +the group "state" has to be remembered between multiple calls of this function,
  +the variables parse_{allow,found}_group are global. It is important to ensure
  +that they are reset to FALSE at the end of scanning a header's list of
  +addresses.


   Arguments:
     mailbox     points to the RFC822 mailbox


  Index: receive.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.29
  retrieving revision 1.30
  diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30
  --- receive.c    25 Sep 2006 10:14:20 -0000    1.29
  +++ receive.c    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.30
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v 1.29 2006/09/25 10:14:20 ph10 Exp $ */
  +/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v 1.30 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */


   /*************************************************
   *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
  @@ -2051,8 +2051,6 @@
       recipients_count = recipients_list_max = 0;
       }


  -  parse_allow_group = TRUE;             /* Allow address group syntax */
  -
     /* Now scan the headers */


     for (h = header_list->next; h != NULL; h = h->next)
  @@ -2063,6 +2061,8 @@
         uschar *s = Ustrchr(h->text, ':') + 1;
         while (isspace(*s)) s++;


  +      parse_allow_group = TRUE;          /* Allow address group syntax */
  +
         while (*s != 0)
           {
           uschar *ss = parse_find_address_end(s, FALSE);
  @@ -2127,7 +2127,10 @@


           s = ss + (*ss? 1:0);
           while (isspace(*s)) s++;
  -        }
  +        }    /* Next address */
  +
  +      parse_allow_group = FALSE;      /* Reset group syntax flags */
  +      parse_found_group = FALSE;


         /* If this was the bcc: header, mark it "old", which means it
         will be kept on the spool, but not transmitted as part of the
  @@ -2137,8 +2140,6 @@
         }   /* For appropriate header line */
       }     /* For each header line */


  -  parse_allow_group = FALSE;      /* Reset group syntax flags */
  -  parse_found_group = FALSE;
     }


/* Now build the unique message id. This has changed several times over the

  Index: sieve.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.22
  retrieving revision 1.23
  diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23
  --- sieve.c    5 Sep 2006 14:05:43 -0000    1.22
  +++ sieve.c    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.23
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v 1.22 2006/09/05 14:05:43 ph10 Exp $ */
  +/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v 1.23 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */


   /*************************************************
   *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
  @@ -1826,6 +1826,8 @@
           if (saveend == 0) break;
           header_value = end_addr + 1;
           }
  +      parse_allow_group = FALSE;
  +      parse_found_group = FALSE;
         }
       }
     return 1;


  Index: verify.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.42
  retrieving revision 1.43
  diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
  --- verify.c    9 Oct 2006 14:36:25 -0000    1.42
  +++ verify.c    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.43
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v 1.42 2006/10/09 14:36:25 ph10 Exp $ */
  +/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v 1.43 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */


   /*************************************************
   *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
  @@ -1451,8 +1451,9 @@
   {
   header_line *h;
   uschar *colon, *s;
  +int yield = OK;


  -for (h = header_list; h != NULL; h = h->next)
  +for (h = header_list; h != NULL && yield == OK; h = h->next)
     {
     if (h->type != htype_from &&
         h->type != htype_reply_to &&
  @@ -1466,9 +1467,10 @@
     s = colon + 1;
     while (isspace(*s)) s++;


  -  parse_allow_group = TRUE;     /* Allow group syntax */
  +  /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note
  +  that we have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */


- /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header */
+ parse_allow_group = TRUE;

     while (*s != 0)
       {
  @@ -1478,7 +1480,7 @@
       int start, end, domain;


       /* Temporarily terminate the string at this point, and extract the
  -    operative address within. */
  +    operative address within, allowing group syntax. */


       *ss = 0;
       recipient = parse_extract_address(s,&errmess,&start,&end,&domain,FALSE);
  @@ -1534,7 +1536,8 @@
           string_sprintf("%s: failing address in \"%.*s:\" header %s: %.*s",
             errmess, tt - h->text, h->text, verb, len, s));


  -      return FAIL;
  +      yield = FAIL;
  +      break;          /* Out of address loop */
         }


       /* Advance to the next address */
  @@ -1542,9 +1545,12 @@
       s = ss + (terminator? 1:0);
       while (isspace(*s)) s++;
       }   /* Next address */
  -  }     /* Next header */


  -return OK;
  +  parse_allow_group = FALSE;
  +  parse_found_group = FALSE;
  +  }     /* Next header unless yield has been set FALSE */
  +
  +return yield;
   }



  @@ -1587,9 +1593,10 @@
       s = colon + 1;
       while (isspace(*s)) s++;


  -    parse_allow_group = TRUE;     /* Allow group syntax */
  +    /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note
  +    that we have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */


  -    /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header */
  +    parse_allow_group = TRUE;


       while (*s != 0)
         {
  @@ -1599,7 +1606,7 @@
         int start, end, domain;


         /* Temporarily terminate the string at this point, and extract the
  -      operative address within. */
  +      operative address within, allowing group syntax. */


         *ss = 0;
         recipient = parse_extract_address(s,&errmess,&start,&end,&domain,FALSE);
  @@ -1623,6 +1630,9 @@
         s = ss + (terminator? 1:0);
         while (isspace(*s)) s++;
         }   /* Next address */
  +
  +    parse_allow_group = FALSE;
  +    parse_found_group = FALSE;
       }     /* Next header (if found is false) */


     if (!found) return FAIL;
  @@ -1705,13 +1715,14 @@
     uschar *pm_mailfrom, int options, int *verrno)
   {
   static int header_types[] = { htype_sender, htype_reply_to, htype_from };
  +BOOL done = FALSE;
   int yield = FAIL;
   int i;


  -for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
  +for (i = 0; i < 3 && !done; i++)
     {
     header_line *h;
  -  for (h = header_list; h != NULL; h = h->next)
  +  for (h = header_list; h != NULL && !done; h = h->next)
       {
       int terminator, new_ok;
       uschar *s, *ss, *endname;
  @@ -1719,6 +1730,11 @@
       if (h->type != header_types[i]) continue;
       s = endname = Ustrchr(h->text, ':') + 1;


  +    /* Scan the addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note that we
  +    have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */
  +
  +    parse_allow_group = TRUE;
  +
       while (*s != 0)
         {
         address_item *vaddr;
  @@ -1761,11 +1777,21 @@
         else
           {
           int start, end, domain;
  -        uschar *address = parse_extract_address(s, log_msgptr, &start,
  -          &end, &domain, FALSE);
  +        uschar *address = parse_extract_address(s, log_msgptr, &start, &end,
  +          &domain, FALSE);


           *ss = terminator;


  +        /* If we found an empty address, just carry on with the next one, but
  +        kill the message. */
  +
  +        if (address == NULL && Ustrcmp(*log_msgptr, "empty address") == 0)
  +          {
  +          *log_msgptr = NULL;
  +          s = ss;
  +          continue;
  +          }
  +
           /* If verification failed because of a syntax error, fail this
           function, and ensure that the failing address gets added to the error
           message. */
  @@ -1773,14 +1799,13 @@
           if (address == NULL)
             {
             new_ok = FAIL;
  -          if (*log_msgptr != NULL)
  -            {
  -            while (ss > s && isspace(ss[-1])) ss--;
  -            *log_msgptr = string_sprintf("syntax error in '%.*s' header when "
  -              "scanning for sender: %s in \"%.*s\"",
  -              endname - h->text, h->text, *log_msgptr, ss - s, s);
  -            return FAIL;
  -            }
  +          while (ss > s && isspace(ss[-1])) ss--;
  +          *log_msgptr = string_sprintf("syntax error in '%.*s' header when "
  +            "scanning for sender: %s in \"%.*s\"",
  +            endname - h->text, h->text, *log_msgptr, ss - s, s);
  +          yield = FAIL;
  +          done = TRUE;
  +          break;
             }


           /* Else go ahead with the sender verification. But it isn't *the*
  @@ -1814,15 +1839,24 @@


         /* Success or defer */


  -      if (new_ok == OK) return OK;
  +      if (new_ok == OK)
  +        {
  +        yield = OK;
  +        done = TRUE;
  +        break;
  +        }
  +
         if (new_ok == DEFER) yield = DEFER;


         /* Move on to any more addresses in the header */


         s = ss;
  -      }
  -    }
  -  }
  +      }     /* Next address */
  +
  +    parse_allow_group = FALSE;
  +    parse_found_group = FALSE;
  +    }       /* Next header, unless done */
  +  }         /* Next header type unless done */


   if (yield == FAIL && *log_msgptr == NULL)
     *log_msgptr = US"there is no valid sender in any header line";


  Index: 0026
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/log/0026,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- 0026    16 Feb 2006 10:05:33 -0000    1.2
  +++ 0026    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.3
  @@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
  -1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 <= x@y U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 <= x@y U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: domain missing or malformed: failing address in "From:" header is: @
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<> rejected after DATA: domain missing or malformed: failing address in "From:" header is: @
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<> rejected after DATA: there is no valid sender in any header line
  -1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 <= <> U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbD-0005vi-00 <= <> U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: body contains trigger
  -1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbD-0005vi-00 <= x@y U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
  -1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbD-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@???> R=r2 T=local_delivery
  -1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbD-0005vi-00 Completed
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbE-0005vi-00 <= x@y U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbE-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@???> R=r2 T=local_delivery
   1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbE-0005vi-00 Completed
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbF-0005vi-00 <= x@y U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbF-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@???> R=r2 T=local_delivery
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbF-0005vi-00 Completed
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbG-0005vi-00 <= <> U=CALLER P=local-smtp S=sss
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbG-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@???> R=r2 T=local_delivery
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbG-0005vi-00 Completed
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<> rejected after DATA: there is no valid sender in any header line


  Index: 0026.userx
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/mail/0026.userx,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- 0026.userx    7 Feb 2006 10:34:59 -0000    1.1
  +++ 0026.userx    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.2
  @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
   From x@y Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
   Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local-smtp (Exim x.yz)
       (envelope-from <x@y>)
  -    id 10HmbD-0005vi-00
  +    id 10HmbE-0005vi-00
       for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  -Message-Id: <E10HmbD-0005vi-00@???>
  +Message-Id: <E10HmbE-0005vi-00@???>
   From: x@y
   Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
   X-warning: this is a test warning
  @@ -13,14 +13,27 @@
   From x@y Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
   Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local-smtp (Exim x.yz)
       (envelope-from <x@y>)
  -    id 10HmbE-0005vi-00
  +    id 10HmbF-0005vi-00
       for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
   to: group name: x@y, p@q;
   reply-to: group name: a@b, c@d;
  -Message-Id: <E10HmbE-0005vi-00@???>
  +Message-Id: <E10HmbF-0005vi-00@???>
   From: x@y
   Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
   X-warning: this is a test warning


   Message 10
  +
  +From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
  +Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local-smtp (Exim x.yz)
  +    id 10HmbG-0005vi-00
  +    for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  +to: group name: x@y, p@q;
  +reply-to: group name:;
  +from: userx@???
  +Message-Id: <E10HmbG-0005vi-00@???>
  +Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  +X-warning: this is a test warning
  +
  +Message 11



  Index: 0026
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/rejectlog/0026,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- 0026    16 Feb 2006 10:05:34 -0000    1.2
  +++ 0026    10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000    1.3
  @@ -37,3 +37,14 @@
   I Message-Id: <E10HmbA-0005vi-00@???>
   F From: x@y
     Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  +1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<> rejected after DATA: there is no valid sender in any header line
  +Envelope-from: <>
  +Envelope-to: <userx@???>
  +P Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local-smtp (Exim x.yz)
  +    id 10HmbB-0005vi-00
  +    for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  +T to: group name: x@y, p@q;
  +R reply-to: group name:;
  +I Message-Id: <E10HmbB-0005vi-00@???>
  +  Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
  +  X-warning: this is a test warning


  Index: 0026
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/scripts/0000-Basic/0026,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- 0026    7 Feb 2006 10:54:33 -0000    1.1
  +++ 0026    10 Oct 2006 15:36:51 -0000    1.2
  @@ -104,4 +104,31 @@
   .
   quit
   ****
  +# Group syntax in reply-to header, but no address (falls back to From: for
  +# header_sender check - From: is valid)
  +exim -odi -bs
  +mail from:<>
  +rcpt to:<userx@???>
  +data
  +to: group name: x@y, p@q;
  +reply-to: group name:;
  +from: userx@???
  +
  +Message 11
  +.
  +quit
  +****
  +# Group syntax in reply-to header, but no address (falls back to From: for
  +# header_sender check - but there is no From:)
  +exim -odi -bs
  +mail from:<>
  +rcpt to:<userx@???>
  +data
  +to: group name: x@y, p@q;
  +reply-to: group name:;
  +
  +Message 12
  +.
  +quit
  +****
   no_msglog_check


  Index: 0026
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/stderr/0026,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- 0026    16 Feb 2006 10:05:34 -0000    1.2
  +++ 0026    10 Oct 2006 15:36:51 -0000    1.3
  @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
   >>> processing "require"
   >>> check verify = header_syntax
   >>> require: condition test failed
  -LOG: 10HmbF-0005vi-00 H=[10.0.0.0] F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: domain missing or malformed: failing address in "From:" header is: @
  +LOG: 10HmbH-0005vi-00 H=[10.0.0.0] F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: domain missing or malformed: failing address in "From:" header is: @
   >>> host in hosts_connection_nolog? no (option unset)
   >>> host in host_lookup? no (option unset)
   >>> host in host_reject_connection? no (option unset)
  @@ -34,4 +34,4 @@
   >>> check condition = ${if match{$message_body}{trigger}{yes}{no}}
   >>>                 = yes
   >>> deny: condition test succeeded
  -LOG: 10HmbG-0005vi-00 H=[10.0.0.0] F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: body contains trigger
  +LOG: 10HmbI-0005vi-00 H=[10.0.0.0] F=<x@y> rejected after DATA: body contains trigger


  Index: 0026
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test/stdout/0026,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- 0026    7 Feb 2006 10:47:37 -0000    1.1
  +++ 0026    10 Oct 2006 15:36:51 -0000    1.2
  @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   250 OK
   250 Accepted
   354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
  -250 OK id=10HmbB-0005vi-00
  +250 OK id=10HmbC-0005vi-00
   221 myhost.test.ex closing connection
   220 myhost.test.ex ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
   250 OK
  @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
   250 OK
   250 Accepted
   354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
  -250 OK id=10HmbC-0005vi-00
  +250 OK id=10HmbD-0005vi-00
   221 myhost.test.ex closing connection
   220 myhost.test.ex ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
   250 OK
  @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
   250 OK
   250 Accepted
   354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
  -250 OK id=10HmbD-0005vi-00
  +250 OK id=10HmbE-0005vi-00
   221 myhost.test.ex closing connection


**** SMTP testing session as if from host 10.0.0.0
@@ -66,5 +66,17 @@
250 OK
250 Accepted
354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
-250 OK id=10HmbE-0005vi-00
+250 OK id=10HmbF-0005vi-00
+221 myhost.test.ex closing connection
+220 myhost.test.ex ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
+250 OK
+250 Accepted
+354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
+250 OK id=10HmbG-0005vi-00
+221 myhost.test.ex closing connection
+220 myhost.test.ex ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
+250 OK
+250 Accepted
+354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
+550 Administrative prohibition
221 myhost.test.ex closing connection