Re: [exim] (no subject)

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: W B Hacker
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: exim users
Aihe: Re: [exim] (no subject)
B. Cook wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I am installing a new server and doing something I've got happening on
> three other servers without a problem..
>
> I put exim on the outside of a qmail/vpopmail install, and exim only does
> smtp auth for ips not allowed to relay.
>
> It has a localhost router designed to send to qmail at 127.0.0.1:8125
>
> I setup a test.domain domain, and a bcook account in vpopmail, and I get
> back a strange message from exim when I try and send a test message.


Looks as if you have triggered the 'political correctness' routine of Exim's AI
engine.

When placed in a sufficiently weird environment, Exim has the ability to act
just the same as the other players so as not to attract undue attention to itself.

Basic survival mechanism, that is.

Reduce the surrounding weirdness and it will stop acting like that.

;-)

Bill


>
>
> Considering: bcook@???
> unique = bcook@???
> dbfn_read: key=R:test.domain
> dbfn_read: key=R:bcook@???
> no address retry record
> bcook@???: queued for routing
>
> routing bcook@???
> --------> localhost router <--------
> local_part=bcook domain=test.domain
> calling localhost router
> localhost router called for bcook@???
> domain = test.domain
> route_item = +localqmail 127.0.0.1
> search_open: lsearch "/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts"
> search_find: file="/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts"
> key="test.domain" partial=-1 affix=NULL starflags=0
> LRU list:
> :/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> End
> internal_search_find: file="/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts"
> type=lsearch key="test.domain"
> file lookup required for test.domain
> in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> lookup yielded:
> test.domain in "lsearch;/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts"? yes (matched
> "lsearch;/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts")
> test.domain in "+localqmail"? yes (matched "+localqmail")
> original list of hosts = "127.0.0.1" options =
> expanded list of hosts = "127.0.0.1" options =
> set transport bsd_smtp
> finding IP address for 127.0.0.1
> calling host_find_byname
> local host found for non-MX address
> fully qualified name = 127.0.0.1
> gethostbyname looked up these IP addresses:
> name=127.0.0.1 address=127.0.0.1
> LOG: MAIN
> remote host address is the local host: test.domain
> localhost router: defer for bcook@???
> message: remote host address is the local host
> added retry item for R:test.domain: errno=-1 more_errno=0 flags=0
> post-process bcook@??? (1)
> LOG: MAIN
> == bcook@??? R=localhost defer (-1): remote host address is the
> local host
>
>
>
> and the routers section from my configure file:
>
> begin routers
>
> localhost:
>  transport      = bsd_smtp
>  driver         = manualroute
>  route_list     = +localqmail 127.0.0.1

>
> manual:
>  transport      = remote_smtp
>  driver         = dnslookup
>  domains        = +manual_domains

>
> smarthost:
>  transport      = remote_smtp
>  driver         = manualroute
>  route_list     = !+manual_domains 1.2.3.4
>  no_more

>
> begin transports
>
> remote_smtp:
>  driver         = smtp

>
> bsd_smtp:
>   driver        = smtp
>   port          = 8125

>
>
> and qmail is running..
> # telnet localhost 8125
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 qmail.test.domain ESMTP
>
> And I have working internal dns..
>
> [root@pcsdmail /usr/local/etc/exim]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search at.home
> nameserver 172.16.64.1
> [root@pcsdmail /usr/local/etc/exim]# host 127.0.0.1
> 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer localhost.
> [root@pcsdmail /usr/local/etc/exim]# host localhost
> localhost.at.home has address 127.0.0.1
>
>
> This is the part that I am confused about in the debug session:
>
> set transport bsd_smtp
> finding IP address for 127.0.0.1
> calling host_find_byname
> local host found for non-MX address
> fully qualified name = 127.0.0.1
> gethostbyname looked up these IP addresses:
> name=127.0.0.1 address=127.0.0.1
>
> I'm confused why it's doing gethostbyname, and why if it's wrong.. why it
> works on the other boxes?
>
>
>