Re: [exim] curly one

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:14:49AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
> Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> Not tested....
>
> - but if the router that handles the spam delivery to the user also has an
> 'unseen' with a paired sibling router that sends a copy to, for example, a comon
> storage location (for later analysis of scanning effectveness, ELSE periodic
> deletion).
>
> - and the 'copy' cares not if the user can/has received, as it marches to the
> beat of a different drummer..
>
> does a bounce get generated when the 'primary' person cannot be delvered to, but
> the 'chained' user-agnostic (always deliverable) router activates and DOES log a
> delivery success?
>


I cannot believe this would work. I would imagine that if you use an
unseen router, you are effectievly processing 2 messages,
(more or less like a fork)
each with its own bounce if delivery fails.

But I could be wrong.

Regards,
pdg

--

See mail headers for contact information.