Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> uh, no, forget this, mbox_file would not be closed then. You could add
> mbox_file = NULL after the fclose in your patch. Or something else, I
> think you'll figure it out yourself. :)
Yes, you're right. :)
Never post a patch until you tested it yourself, even if it's such a
small change. :)
Nico
--- spool_mbox.c.buggy 2006-09-21 17:55:42.000000000 +0200
+++ spool_mbox.c 2006-09-21 19:02:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@
};
};
} while (j > 0);
+ (void)fclose(mbox_file);
+ mbox_file = NULL;
Ustrcpy(spooled_message_id, message_id);
spool_mbox_ok = 1;
