On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> > I think in the case of exim -v -bv test-bv last one should be like this:
> >
> > [root@beast ~]# exim -v -bv test-bv
> > test-bv@??? failed to verify:
> > alamakota@???
> > Unknown user
> > darek@???
> > <-- test-bv@???
> > router = localuser_maildir, transport = ld_maildir
>
> test-bv _did_ verify successfully in this case, since there was at least
> one valid recipient. this is quite important to report correctly, since
> it mimics the truth value of "verify = recipient" in an ACL.
I can argue against that because "verify = recipient" in an ACL is
equivalent to "exim -bv" NOT "exim -v -bv". When only -bv is used, it
*does* succeed. However, I agree that in the example above, it should
show the actual unknown user and the detail of the redirection.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
