On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
>
> > Urgh, yuck. Why not use an ACL variable?
>
> Simple reason here was that we don't have any left to spare. ;-)
> (unless Phil bumped from 0-9 to 0-99 when I wasn't looking...)
ChangeLog for version 4.61:
PH/06 Increased the number of ACL variables to 20 of each type, and arranged
for visible compile-time settings that can be used to change these
numbers, for those that want even more. Backwards compatibility with old
spool files has been maintained. However, going back to a previous Exim
release will lost any variables that are in spool files.
> In any case, what would it gain, code-wise?
It's ugly to mess around with the message header in order to implement
envelope-level logic.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
