Re: [exim] non-address header syntax checking

On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 08:40 +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
> Haven't seen the need to use Cyrus *at all* in recent years.

how many users do you have?

> Exim+Dovecot with TLS-only auth, 8-bit safe, UTF-8 virtual/all user DB driven,
> and we have Asian and Eastern European correspondents covered with near-zero effort.

Cyrus is 8-bit safe, it just won't accept messages which aren't correct
according to RFCs.

> Where is the remaining advantage? - or does Cyrus even still have any that
> justify the extra work?

it's way more scalable than Dovecot. I'd say the break-even point is at
about 10k users.

--
Kjetil T.