Re: [exim] non-address header syntax checking

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: W B Hacker
Fecha:  
A: exim users
Asunto: Re: [exim] non-address header syntax checking
Phil Chambers wrote:

*snip*

>
> (Do people who use Cyrus generally set reject8bit to 1?)
>
> Phil.


Haven't seen the need to use Cyrus *at all* in recent years.

Exim+Dovecot with TLS-only auth, 8-bit safe, UTF-8 virtual/all user DB driven,
and we have Asian and Eastern European correspondents covered with near-zero effort.

Where is the remaining advantage? - or does Cyrus even still have any that
justify the extra work?

Seriously - not a flame...

Bill