Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MChris Blaise at <-
MChris Blaise at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Chris Blaise
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Chris Blaise wrote: 

>    I maintain that if an administrator for a domain has taken the time
> and effort to publish SPF records for the servers authorized to deliver mail
> as their domain, then it's perfectly legitimate to reject mail from
> non-authorized servers.


We've been here before. What about forwarded mail? 

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spfRe: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)