Re: [exim-dev] [PATCH] spool_mbox cleanup

Jakob Hirsch wrote:

> ok, but spool_mbox has nothing to with received headers, so I wonder why
> Tom used received_for there, when $recipients is available and doing the
> right thing.

SA can pull some information from Received: headers. Exim only adds its
own Received: header after all ACL processing, where it was too late for
SMTP-inline SA to pick it up. I "solved" the problem by adding a fake
"preliminary" Received: header to the mbox spool file. I don't remember
where I got the expansion template from, but I didn't invent it myself :)