Re: [exim] Refusing MAIL FROM:<> ...

On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:14:26AM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Steven Wayne wrote:
>
> > > Oh, one second thing:
> > > Exim also said: "(result of an earlier callout reused)". But RFC 2821
> > > says (section 4.5.4.1, Par. 9): "More significantly, 5yz responses to
> > > the MAIL command MUST NOT be cached.". Hmmm.
> > >
> >
> > I found that interesting, has anyone got anything further to say about it?
>
> Only that 2821 is talking about mail delivery, not callouts.
>

Ah, I wasn't aware the RFCs would differentiate, nor did I look it up
myself.

Well I am on holiday this week.

Steven.
--
While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to perfect several.