Re: [exim] Refusing MAIL FROM:<> ...

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:18:10AM +0200, Daniel Tiefnig wrote:
> Hej,
>
<snip>
>
> Oh, one second thing:
> Exim also said: "(result of an earlier callout reused)". But RFC 2821
> says (section 4.5.4.1, Par. 9): "More significantly, 5yz responses to
> the MAIL command MUST NOT be cached.". Hmmm.
>

I found that interesting, has anyone got anything further to say about it?

Steven.
--
To vacillate or not to vacillate, that is the question ... or is it?