Re: [exim] Delay_warning_condition - new default?

Página Principal
Apagar esta mensagem
Responder a esta mensagem
Autor: Jethro R Binks
Data:  
Para: exim users
Assunto: Re: [exim] Delay_warning_condition - new default?
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Jethro R Binks wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall Philip very recently changed the default for
> > delay_warning_default to include values for the Auto-Submitted: header
> > too.
>
> Indeed I did. The change will be in the 4.63 release, which I hope to
> have out next week.
>
> > > The question may be what 'List-' headers should be checked?
>
> Are List- headers standardized, as the Auto-Submitted: header is?


This RFC discusses them:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2369.txt

"The Use of URLs as Meta-Syntax for Core Mail List Commands and their
Transport through Message Header Fields"

Jethro.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jethro R Binks
Computing Officer, IT Services
University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK