Re: [exim] sender verify and greylisting

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Tony Finch
日付:  
To: W B Hacker
CC: exim-users
題目: Re: [exim] sender verify and greylisting
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
> Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your
> > messages sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let
> > alone "less" thread-aware MUAs.
>
> As in the screenshot: http://conducive.org/threading.tiff


There's no threading there. That's just sorting by subject with some bogus
scaffolding on the left-hand-side. Note that you don't have more than one
level of nesting, as (for example) the pipermail archive does.
See how Pine shows it, with nesting: http://dotat.at/graphics/pine.png
In particular see how the "ACL to reject spam" and MailScanner threads
have a structure that your screenshot doesn't show, and how the structure
of various threads has been flattened by your replies.

> And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as
> to help *others*?


You have been told several times.

http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00114.html
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00121.html
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00125.html

RFC 2822 section 3.6.4.

References and In-Reply-To.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}