On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > Btw, your MUA is misbehaving -- your replies have neither In-Reply-To:
> > nor References: headers, so they're not associated with the thread to
> > which you replied. Please could you fix that so that you don't break the
> > threading on the list?
>
> Pipermail (online archives) handles that well enough, and Mozilla Mail has no
> problem at all with it. Which MUA is not following it?
Actually, pipermail does show the problem: if you look at this thread in
the archive you will see that your reply to David is not indented further
to the right under David's message, so from the thread structure it
appears to be a reply to the original message.
References-based threading is not the same as sorting messages by subject.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
