Auteur: W B Hacker Date: À: exim users Sujet: Re: [exim] [unclassified] Re: return path set in transport,
but it doesnt work
Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:29:59AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday 05 July 2006 00:04, Marc Haber took the opportunity to write:
>>
>>>On 4 Jul 2006 20:57:27 -0000, "Peter Bowyer" <peter@???> did
>>>
>>>not write:
>>>
>>>>Please take these amateur home 'server' questions to the Debian exim
>>>>mailing list. The exim-users list is for professional mail
>>>>administrators, not every student who can boot a Linux distro and
>>>>thinks he should run his own 'mail server'.
>>>
>>>This is another case of anonymous remailer abuse, a Joe Job against
>>>Peter.
>>
>>Always signing one's mail has its advantages.
>
>
> yes, it means when you want to create ambiguity you can
> leave the signature off a mail....
>
..or, in the case of one of the folks I regularly correspond
with, means a PGP sig that is often larger in byte-count than
the message body. As if the headers were not already such.
As they routinely are with sesame's MLM settings vs many posts
to this list.
