On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:35 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:10:14AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > Cute idea, but I don't like the implementation much -- it would be
> > better for it to be available in a general fashion from ACLs.
>
> I looked at that first. However, since (AFAICT) the ACL system works in a
> accept/reject/defer logic, my understanding was that a fourth command would had
> to be added to the underlying code specificaly for this feature. Is this
> appreciation correct?
I was thinking of
deny condition = foo
message = User not local and use you SPF. Try <$addr>
errorcode = 551
--
dwmw2
