Re: [exim-dev] [PATCH] Implement redirect

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M+\Tony Finch at <-
MMMDavid Woodhouse at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Richard.Hall
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] [PATCH] Implement redirect

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
[...]

> Besides, in the long term, this should get better. After all, 551 is
> a standard response defined in RFC 2821. I don't see why any MTA
> wouldn't want to support it in the sender side.

Well, I wouldn't want to deal with "A redirects to B, B redirects to C, C
redirects to D, ..."

OTOH I'm not an MTA.

HTH,
Richard



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim-dev] [PATCH] Implement redirectRe: [exim-dev] [PATCH] Implement redirect->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)