Re: [exim] Which behaviour is expected/standard from a retur…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Jon Bendtsen
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Which behaviour is expected/standard from a return-path value?
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Jon Bendtsen wrote:

> However the exchange server does not appear to use that
> return-path value when an email address bounce.


Exchange is not standards-compliant. It is a non-Internet workgroup email
server with Internet functionality bolted on after the fact. The most
obvious aspect of this is that Exchange and Outlook don't use RFC 822
header syntax.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}