Den tirsdag 27.jun kl. 16:18 skrev Tony Finch:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
>>
>> I have not tried debugging, which level do you suggest i should try?
>
> Dunno. The debugging system is different in Exim 4 so I can't remember
> what's a good choice with Exim 3. Try cranking it up to the max.
>
>>> By the way, Exim 3 has been obsolete and unsupported for years.
>>
>> And why change when it worked so far?
>
> Lurking bugs. No support.
i know, but so far it doesnt seem to be that much of a problem, and
there
are bugs in exim 4 as well.
On a side note i decided to do a tcpdump before changing the debug
level,
and it appears to me that the message is sent correctly and that it
is the exchange
server that ignores the return-path, sorry for the trouble.
me remote exchange
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
EHLO frodo.laerdal.global
Hello [192.168.119.133]
250-XXXA
250-SIZE 15360000
250-ETRN
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8bitmime
250-BINARYMIME
250-XXXXXXXB
250-VRFY
250-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXC
250-XXXXXXXXXXXD
250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-XXXXXXXXXXXE
250-XXXXXXF
250 XG
MAIL FROM:<root@???> SIZE=1517
RCPT TO:<bendtsenjon@???>
DATA
root@???....Sender OK
(tcpdump shows garbage)
bendtsenjon@???
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
(tcpdump shows garbage)
Received: from jbendtsen by frodo.laerdal.global with local (Exim
3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1FvF2m-0004XL-00
for <bendtsenjon@???>; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:00:00 +0200
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:59:59 +0200
To: bendtsenjon@???
Subject: testing foobar
Message-ID: <20060627145959.GA17435@???>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jon Bendtsen <jbendtsen@???>
foobar testing
<20060627145959.GA17435@???> Queued mail
for delivery
QUIT
