Re: [exim] return path set in transport, but it doesnt work

Den tirsdag 27.jun kl. 16:51 skrev John Burnham:

> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I have not tried debugging, which level do you suggest i should try?
>>
>> Dunno. The debugging system is different in Exim 4 so I can't
>> remember what's a good choice with Exim 3. Try cranking it up
>> to the max.
>
> I remember -d 9 being a good choice.

Okay, thanks.


>>
>>>> By the way, Exim 3 has been obsolete and unsupported for years.
>>>
>>> And why change when it worked so far?
>>
>> Lurking bugs. No support.
>>
> Much more powerful way to handle messages with ACLs.

What would i gain from that with a simple mailserver that just relays
to another server?


> One thing - have you tried adding
> return_path_add = true
> to your transport ? I'm clutching at straws though because it's
> been over 3
> years since I last had anything to do with an Exim 3 install.
> Strangely enough,
> I was called in to look at an Exim 2 installation more recently
> than that. That
> took some head scratching and much rereading of the spec to try to
> remember how
> that worked....

Heh. Wouldnt it be easier to upgrade?