Re: [exim] Filtering spam bounces

Alastair Campbell wrote:
> John W. Baxter wrote:
> > As part of my long-running campaign to get rid of the catchall in my domain,
> > I have now changed the settings so that catchall mail goes to the cleverly
> > named "invalid" mailbox (which I read once or twice a week in an MUA devoted
> > to the purpose).
>
> If Jacob's idea doesn't work out I'll have to do something like that,
> but it's only bounces I have a problem with, spam itself is dealt with
> effectively.

Why not just block bounces to the catchall?

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???