Re: [exim] Filtering spam bounces

On 5/15/06 3:12 AM, "Alastair Campbell" <ac@???> wrote:

> I'm afraid it's too late, I've used it over the last 5 years, and didn't
> keep track of all the addresses used.

As part of my long-running campaign to get rid of the catchall in my domain,
I have now changed the settings so that catchall mail goes to the cleverly
named "invalid" mailbox (which I read once or twice a week in an MUA devoted
to the purpose).

Before I set that up, I had the catchall going both to the main mailbox and
to a separate one--which was handy when I had lots of catchall hits.

I'm down to few enough hits per month there that I'm almost ready to ditch
the catchall, having added aliases as needed for over a year now.

--John