Re: [exim] rfc3462 (multipart/report) support

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M\Tony Finch at <-
MMPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Andrey Melnikoff
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] rfc3462 (multipart/report) support
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Andrey Melnikoff wrote:

> Why transport? If someone comment out this transport from config - no
> bounces ? Creating black-hole - is bad, wery bad.

It would be very easy to insist on the presence of the transport, or
alternatively, to assume a default transport if one was not defined. 

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] rfc3462 (multipart/report) supportRe: [exim] Problem with ROUTER in exim.->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)