Stanislaw Halik <sthalik@???> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> Slightly offtopic: it's bad that no alternative to SA (preferably
>>> written in C) exists, it seems not to do much more than DNSBL checks,
>>> MIME decoding, HTML parsing and regexp matching. Even with that, on a
>>> pretty minimalistic setup, the daemon occupies 110MB of memory.
>> Where do you get the 100M from
> 50 MBytes from the 'master' process and 60MBytes from the 'child'.
>> how are you measuring it?
> top(1), ps(1).
I seem to get a lot less:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
28684 am-spamd 9 0 28072 21m 18m S 0.0 1.4 2:09.19 spamd
30159 am-spamd 9 0 25620 1920 1488 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.14 spamd
Using 3.1.0a, running spamassassin from exim's data ACL.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde
