Re: [exim] fuel on fire: RFCs for Sender ID, SPF, etc.

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> Four new RFCs have just been released to the public RFC archives.
> They're all Experimental, so in NO way are supposed to be regarded as
> standards for general deployment.

They also have seriously discouraging IESG notes.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}