Re: [exim] emails going down under

On 2006-04-27 at 14:00 +0100, John Clement wrote:
> Phil Pennock wrote:
> > How about if you specify "exim -oMr spam-scanned -bt jc@???"?
> >
> > Changing "spam-scanned" to whichever Received Protocol is actually used
> > to bypass the spamcheck Router in the configuration?
> >
> Does it seem reasonable from the lines from exim.conf below that it is
> actually 'spamcheck' it uses? If so here are results:

spamcheck is the name of the transport. The needed value was the
probable suspect, "spam-scanned". It's this part:

> condition = "${if and { {!eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}} {!eq
> {$received_protocol}{local}} {!eq {$received_protocol}{local-esmtp}}
> {!eq {${domain:$header_from:}}{readingroom.com}} {!eq
> {$sender_host_address}{127.0.0.1}} } {1}{0}}"

or "if this and that and the other thing, then run this router" where
"this" is "$received_protocol is NOT equal to spam-scanned" ("!eq").

So by specifying that the received_protocol _is_ that (via -oMr) you
skip this router and get to see the results from the later, real,
router:

> # /usr/exim/bin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bt firstname.lastname@???
> f_lastname@???
>     <-- f_lastname@???
>     <-- firstname.lastname@???
>     <-- firstname.lastname@???
>   router = localuser, transport = local_delivery

Regards,
-Phil