RE: [SPAM] - Re: [exim] How to deal with '<>' mails - Bayesi…

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Catherine Morrisroe
Datum:  
To: exim-users
Betreff: RE: [SPAM] - Re: [exim] How to deal with '<>' mails - Bayesian Filter detected spam
Cheers for this tony,

I am trying to get it to check for the null sender address and then do
the verify on the recipient but I just can't get it to work, its failing
on the check for the null sender address and not getting as far as the
verify.
This is my best effort (or worst- haven't decided yet) so far:

deny    message = I dont accept mail with a NULL SENDER ADDRESS &
invalid
        RECIPIENT ADDRESS
        condition  = ${if $sender_address = <>}
      !verify         = recipient/callout=random,10s


Does anyone know about the ndr's going out with no from postmaster
address...


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Finch [mailto:fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
Sent: 12 April 2006 16:09
To: Catherine Morrisroe
Cc: exim-users@???
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [exim] How to deal with '<>' mails - Bayesian
Filter detected spam

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Catherine Morrisroe wrote:
>
> I was thinking of simply denying such mails based on recipient
> verification, but I'm not sure what the condition should look like for
> this.. if anyone had any ideas they would be greatly appreciated.


require verify = recipient

or if you are feeling strict,

require verify = recipient/callout

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}