On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, David Saez Padros wrote:
> yes, but in this particular case this does not matter as the acl is
> only used for informational purposes. Maybe having something like
> control = no_defer or +ignore_defer could be useful in that situations
> where is more important to accept messages when some non critical acl
> defers than the informational function of that acl.
We already have +include_unknown as well as +ignore_unknown, so I
suppose we would add +accept_defer or +ignore_defer. I have put
something on the WishList, where I see there are a number of items that
refer to defers of various kinds. But this is all too late now for 4.61.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
