On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Chris Thompson wrote:
> W B Hacker <wbh@???> writes:
> > But TWX and Telex are no longer a factor, and X.400 not far
> > behind - outside of a few specialty organizations.
>
> Indeed, I was interested to see that RFC 4450 ("Getting Rid of the
> Cruft: Report from an Experiment in Identifying and Reclassifying
> Obsolete Standards Documents") refers to X.400 as one of the
> "protocols that are obsolete" (section 4). NB not "obsolescent"!
It still has enough users for ISODE to make money :-) Though from the
point of view of the Internet, RFC 4450 is correct.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
