Re: [exim] Re: bounce messages and their potential misuse

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Jeremy Harris
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: exim-users
Aihe: Re: [exim] Re: bounce messages and their potential misuse
Adam Funk wrote:
> But when MTA(n) rejects a message that MTA(n-1) is trying to relay,
> MTA(n-1) has to bounce it, right?


Which in turn is why MTA(n-1) should be doing recipient-verify callouts.
-Jeremy