Re: [exim] Re: bounce messages and their potential misuse

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MPeter Bowyer at <-
MMPeter Bowyer at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Re: bounce messages and their potential misuse
Adam Funk wrote:
> But when MTA(n) rejects a message that MTA(n-1) is trying to relay,
> MTA(n-1) has to bounce it, right?

Which in turn is why MTA(n-1) should be doing recipient-verify callouts.
-Jeremy


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] bounce messages and their potential misuseRe: [exim] Re: bounce messages and their potential misuse->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)