Bradley Walker wrote:
> I didn't ignore your first message, in fact I read it, have it archived in a
> folder here to continue to try and discern helpful information from. Being
> I'm working 14-17 hours a day as a business owner, replies sometimes can't
> always come in due time.
Sorry if I seemed rude, but the only thing that can be seen is you
constantly asking about this problem, without giving feedback.
> appropriately. However the system itself is not under a stressful load at
> this point. Load averages throughout the day sometimes can even be
> 0.0/0.0/0.0 while email is continually being processed.
It's still strange that 5 minutes is not enough for SA to process a
single message. This is usually a sign of an overloaded system or very
heave rulesets. What's your hardware and mail volume?
btw, if you don't need user-specific rulesets and bayes-db, you should
switch to content scanning at ACL time. It's less complex, more stable
and lowers system load.
And if you trust your users a little bit (after all, you have a
contract), you can exclude authenticated senders from spam scanning.
> Several people on the SpamAssassin list have commented that the spamc child
> process has been terminated created the error that I orginially posted.
That may be true, but 5 minutes should be really enough for SA to scan a
message.
