On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Marc Sherman wrote:
> >
> > Philip, I think it would be good if warn set a header on an accept, as
> > well. Can you add that to the wishlist?
>
> Actually, the more I think about it, I think it would be better if there
> were a new "headers_add" ACL condition that added a message header
> unconditionally, regardless of the verb it was used on; using message on
> warn to set headers could then be deprecated.
Already on the Wish List:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(237) 02-Feb-04 M Add_header in ACLs because "message" is overloaded
This would be useful for verbs where "message" is an error message. See also
333.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book