On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:36 +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure that having a 30 second RFC1413 timeout is useful in any
> > > normal circumstances nowadays. Best bet is to reduce it down to (say) 5
> > > seconds.
> >
> > I agree.
>
> Do you think I should change the default to 5s?
Personally, yes. I don't think there are many sites for whom that is
both useful and they don't come back within 5 seconds.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]