Re: [exim-dev] more Resent- problems

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] more Resent- problems
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> Hmm. It claims that it does rewrite them...


Hmm, that would imply Exim is using the same htype flag for Resent- and
normal headers, and that I didn't look at receive.c properly before
sending my message. Some debugging proves this is true. Sorry for the
false alarm!

However something is causing widen_domains not to do its thing properly on
my machines, so I'll have to do some more investigation...

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}