> > I am wondering if replacing (simplified, left out my -d ip,ip and more
> > complex -u for spamc):
> > command = /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
> > transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc -f -s 500000 -u nobody
> > with for instance:
> > command = /usr/local/bin/spamc -B -f -t 30 -s 500000 -u nobody -e
> > /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
> > (and no transport_filter) helps.
Hmm, after reading the manpage of spamc I am not that enthusiastic
anymore:
-e command [args]
Instead of writing to stdout, pipe the output to command's
standard input. Note that there is a very slight chance mail will be
lost here, because if the fork-and-exec fails there's no place to put
the mail message.
I think that a transport_filter is therefore a better option.
But what is still confusing me, is that the mail don't get delivered.
When spamc gets a timeout, that should be a 4xx error (which is the
case). But why does the message bounce?
Marco
