Re: [exim] alternative to local_part_suffix in ACL?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marc Sherman
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] alternative to local_part_suffix in ACL?
Chris Knadle wrote:
>
>> 2) set address_data in the router where you use local_parts_suffix, and
>> use $address_data in the ACL after recipient verification
>
>    The reason that I don't want to do this in a router is that I am trying to 
> do these checks during the initial rcpt checks, before the contents of the 
> message is ever sent.  This avoids generating unecessary bounce messages 
> resulting from an address failure during the router.  [I don't want to be a 
> source of backscatter.]


I think you missed the point of what I wrote: "in the ACL after
recipient verification".

If the manipulation of the recipient address is done in the router, and
you set address_data in that router, you can then test address_data in
your ACL (at SMTP time) after doing recipient verification. See the
documentation for $address_data in chapter 11.

- Marc