Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument

Page principale
Ce message fait partie du fil suivant :
M-+\Arborescence complète du fil triée par date
M\MMJohn W. Baxter à <-
MMAdam Funk à ->
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: David Woodhouse
Date:  
À: Chris.Knadle
CC: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:38 -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
>    The thing here is that you really want the secondary MX to have the user 
> list of the primary so that don't end up having the secondary trying to push 
> mail through that the primary rejects, and then sending bounces.  This ends 
> up pushing a redesign of the mail system -- although that's probably a good 
> idea anyway.

require verify=recipient/callout/defer_ok

--
dwmw2



Ce message a été envoyé sur les listes de diffusion suivantes :
Exim-users
Informations sur la liste de diffusion | Messages voisins		<-Re: [exim] Help With Exim ArgumentRe: [exim] problem with "\n" in a transport text->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administré par cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)