Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MMJohn W. Baxter at <-
MMAdam Funk at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David Woodhouse
Date:  
To: Chris.Knadle
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:38 -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
>    The thing here is that you really want the secondary MX to have the user 
> list of the primary so that don't end up having the secondary trying to push 
> mail through that the primary rejects, and then sending bounces.  This ends 
> up pushing a redesign of the mail system -- although that's probably a good 
> idea anyway.

require verify=recipient/callout/defer_ok

--
dwmw2



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Help With Exim ArgumentRe: [exim] problem with "\n" in a transport text->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)