Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument

Pàgina inicial
Aquest missatge és part del següent fil:
M-+\l'arbre de fils complet ordenat per data
M\MMJohn W. Baxter en <-
MMAdam Funk en ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: David Woodhouse
Data:  
A: Chris.Knadle
CC: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] Help With Exim Argument
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:38 -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
>    The thing here is that you really want the secondary MX to have the user 
> list of the primary so that don't end up having the secondary trying to push 
> mail through that the primary rejects, and then sending bounces.  This ends 
> up pushing a redesign of the mail system -- although that's probably a good 
> idea anyway.

require verify=recipient/callout/defer_ok

--
dwmw2



Aquest missatge es va enviar a les següents llistes de correu:
Exim-users
Informació sobre la llista de correu | Missatges propers		<-Re: [exim] Help With Exim ArgumentRe: [exim] problem with "\n" in a transport text->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrat per cumin AdminsLurker (versió 2.3)