Marc Sherman a écrit :
> Sam wrote:
>> But when the dns-reverse-lookup failed, I get an error :
>> 2006-01-21 12:06:52 H=(XXX.XX) [XXX.XX.XXX.XXX] Warning: ACL "warn"
>> statement skipped: condition test deferred: host lookup deferred for
>> reverse lookup check
>> 2006-01-21 12:06:54 1F0Ga5-0005zM-Cb <= lianneshoulders@???
>> H=(XXX.XX) [XXX.XX.XXX.XXX] P=smtp S=1316
>> id=4f6c01c61db1$1f6557b0$885feceb@lianneshoulders
>> And the message is accepted.
>
> Did it occur to you that maybe we'd need the unobfuscated IP and host
> name to help you with a DNS problem relating specifically to those
> IPs/hosts?
> http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MailingListEtiquette#head-a6f7fb5ce8816568569a321f783315207ec38063
Yes, I understand it's better with ip and host for specific problem, but
I just wanted to know if my acl is good or if I messed an option in the
configuration file in order to manage failed reverse ip in my acl.
This is full log :
2006-01-21 12:06:52 H=(personal.ro) [218.82.184.220] Warning: ACL "warn"
statement skipped: condition test deferred: host lookup deferred for
reverse lookup check
2006-01-21 12:06:54 1F0Ga5-0005zM-Cb <= lianneshoulders@???
H=(personal.ro) [218.82.184.220] P=smtp S=1316
id=4f6c01c61db1$1f6557b0$885feceb@lianneshoulders
2
> By the way, the solution to your problem already exists commented out in
> the default Debian configuration files.
I'm a little newbie with exim and don't see exactly where to search to
tell my acl to consider failed reverse dns as if there were no reverse
dns at all ... beacause I think that's the problem in the error log.
Thanks.
Sam.
