Tony Finch wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Steffen Heil wrote:
>
>>However, exim printe "Unrouteable address" instread of "unknown user". Why?
>>Is there something I can do?
>
>
> Error messages resulting from failure to route an address are best
> generated in the routers rather than in the ACLs. We have a catch-all
> router like this:
>
> unknown_user:
> driver = redirect
> data = :fail: \
> "${local_part}@${domain}" is not a known user on this system.
> allow_fail
>
> Tony.
ACK.
ISTR that unless replaced or surpressed, the message used will
ordinarily *be* the default generated by the last router in the chain.
Indication by any earlier router that it could/could not deliver would
not be a (final) fail.
Hence, any acl with "!verify = recipients" would not ordinarily need a
'message' of its own.
A "log_message" maybe.
Bill
