On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
> (1) Exim should log the message size as received, in addition to or
> instead of its size after alterations by Exim. I don't mind whether
> this replaces or augments the existing S= field. Any opinions?
I think given that people are used to the S= field being the way it is, it
would be inappropriate to tinker with it now. There may be uses for both
fields in the logs, so I would suggest augmenting the existing field.
Jethro.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jethro R Binks
Computing Officer, IT Services
University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
