On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Chris Edwards wrote:
> Do those other applications expand 192.168.N/24 to 192.168.N.0/24 ?
>
> (which is what people will assume)
>
> A friend who tried to nmap 192.168.55/24 got a suprise when it actually
> scanned 192.168.0.0/24 (3rd octed zero, not the desired effect at all!)
>
> I'd suggest flagging such things as syntax errors, if poss.
That is what I now plan to do.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
