On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:42:21 +0000 (GMT), Philip Hazel
<ph10@???> wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Actually, the stem of the problem is either an exim feature or an exim
>> bug. Whether bug or feature needs to be decided by exim's authors.
>
>If you want a decision from me, you'll have to explain exactly what this
>bug-feature is, because I have not been paying attention to this thread.
Exim handles "192.168.0/24" as a domain name, not as an IP address.
Most other applications expand 192.168.0/24 to 192.168.0.0/24 and
handle it like an IP network then. This behavior seems consistent with
ipv6 custom.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
