Re: [exim] smtp_accept_max_per_connection

Dean Brooks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:59:51PM +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Phil Chambers wrote:
> >
> > > If there is no such variable I will have to use one of the $acl_cx variables to
> > > do my own counting. Since there only 10 such variables it would be nice not to
> > > have to use one for this.
> >
> > Why not? This is exactly the kind of function for which they were
> > invented.
>
> I think maybe his point was that because there are so few variables,
> he didn't want to waste one on that function.
>
> I too wish there were at least 100 or maybe even 1000 variables
> available for use instead of just 10. In large configurations, its
> easy to hit the limit of 10 very quickly.

I'd prefer named acl variables akin to the *lists. It could be dynamically
allocated and sorted for lookup speed.

It might break something, but I wouldn't know what that would be. In my
installations, it wouldn't break anything.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???