Author: Daniel Tiefnig Date: To: exim-dev Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Preliminary testing of a new Exim test suite
Philip Hazel wrote: > I may have to start sending you patches for that. I did change the
> name of a cipher to one that I thought should be recognisable.
Hmmm. "openssl ciphers" says:
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA
EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA DES-CBC3-MD5 DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA
DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA RC2-CBC-MD5 DHE-DSS-RC4-SHA RC4-SHA
RC4-MD5 RC4-MD5 RC4-64-MD5 EXP1024-DHE-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA
EXP1024-DES-CBC-SHA EXP1024-RC2-CBC-MD5 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA
EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA DES-CBC-SHA DES-CBC-MD5 EXP1024-DHE-DSS-RC4-SHA
EXP1024-RC4-SHA EXP1024-RC4-MD5 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA
EXP-EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA EXP-DES-CBC-SHA EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5
EXP-RC4-MD5 EXP-RC4-MD5
>> The MessageID is different, hard to spot at the first glance.
>> test-mail-munged also contains lots of the following line:
>> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>
> That may be a hard one; different message ids usually means a timing
> effect has put the messages into a different order.
Ah, that doesn't sound good. Indeed another two testruns finished
successfully, the third failed again.
